Skip to main content

Introduction



Thanks for taking the time to not only visit my humble site but to also read about my vision for it.
Here’s a little bit about me in case we’ve never met.  I’m an undergrad student majoring in Economics and Humanities, and I'm also minoring in Political Science and Business Administration.  Those fields of study probably betray my tendency to think deeply–perhaps too deeply–about everyday things we often take for granted.  When I was young, I was that child who asked “why?” about everything, and I haven't changed much.  I enjoy contemplating the hidden, abstract forces of reality, and I do it a lot.  I also happen to have a short attention span, bouncing from one idea to the next.  Sometimes when I think I’m onto something neat I’ll get distracted and forget what I was thinking about.
And that’s where the idea for a blog started.  Blogs are canvases, and I could use one to spit out some thoughts I’d like to develop.  The publicity of a blog would also motivate me to develop them well, and, if blogging helps, to keep spitting out thoughts.
A few words of explanation before we start.  First, I’m guessing that most of my posts will be more like streams of thought rather than well-crafted essays.  The rough draft will probably be very close to, if not the same as, the final draft.  As a result, any grammarians hopping through here will likely leave with a twitch in their eye, but I've decided I don't mind because this blog is intended to be my thoughts on "paper" rather than a collection of successful standalone essays.  
Second, my writing style.  It probably won’t take long for you to find that my writing is not a beach read.  I’m usually a linear, logical thinker, and my writing tends to follow a similar pattern.  I guess I’m telling you this because A) You’ve now been warned.  B) You should know I’m not being pretentious or trying to impress anybody.  C) Most importantly, I’m not assuming my readers are dumb; I’m assuming my readers are different from me.  If we have different backgrounds and different modes of thought, your connection of A and D won’t be as persuasive to me because I won’t necessarily assume B and C like you would.  Explaining B and C helps me appreciate your thought as a whole.  So, even if B and C make the writing dense, I find explaining them to be worth the time.  If a reader understands where I’m going with a point, I take no offense with him skimming or reading the first and last sentences of paragraphs or something.  (Not that you needed my permission, but at least you know I'm aware of the issue and condone a sensible response.)
Third, "knowlership" is kinda just an inside joke.  If you don't know it, it's not worth explaining here.  
Onto actual writing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Loving the Little Ones – Entering the Foster Care Problem

“There can be no keener revelation of a society’s soul than the way in which it treats its children.”  — Nelson Mandela Child protection agencies confirm about 2.5 million cases of child abuse or neglect each year. Social workers intervene to help parents develop better habits and parenting skills in the hope of creating a safe, nurturing environment for their children. Although most child service workers and researchers agree that remaining with their biological parents during this time is usually best for a child’s development, some environments are too damaging, and the children need to be removed. Less than a third of children removed from their biological parents are able to stay with a family member, leaving the rest to institutional care or non-relatives — foster families. With roughly 270,000 to 300,000 children entering the foster care system every year, it is difficult to overstate children’s need for hospitable homes. Some analysts anticipate this need will grow fur...
Post a Comment
Read more

Syrian Missile Strikes are About Brand, Not Strategy

The United States, along with France and the United Kingdom, launched missile strikes against Syria on April 7. In a prepared statement, President Trump declared these strikes were a “deterrent” in response to a poison gas attack in Douma, a city a few miles northeast of Damascus, that killed hundreds of civilians. President Trump also stated these attacks were vital to U.S. security. But without a long-term plan, the strikes raise more questions about the United States’ foreign policy strategy than answers. Earlier in April, Trump ordered the removal of troops from Syria, but there is no indication of how the U.S. expects to administer this policy after the strike. Given how little foreign intervention has impacted Syria’s civil war, it is unlikely that these strikes will alter the course of the conflict that has claimed and displaced hundreds of thousands of lives since 2011. It’s much more likely that these high-profile strikes are more effective in shaping the Trump admin...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Danger of Creativity

Why are we often frightened to demonstrate our work?  Perhaps I’m in the minority, but I have often hesitated to share fruits of my labor.  Whether artistic, athletic, or academic, I tended to keep my projects hidden, if I had a say in the matter.  While I’m unsure how many others resonate with my reluctance, I do know that I am not alone in this mindset.  Is this mindset good?  Does it more significantly promote humility or insecurity?  Should we encourage such thoughts or deter them? I propose that our fear of expressing our creativity is rooted in the uniquely personal nature of the human imagination, for no human faculty offers so clear a window into one’s soul.  To help us more properly respond to the sentiment in question, I wish to investigate its origin. When we create, we engage at least three distinct faculties: understanding, imagination, and the body.  Consider a chef.  To cook well, the chef must know the traits and capabil...
Post a Comment
Read more