Skip to main content

Introduction



Thanks for taking the time to not only visit my humble site but to also read about my vision for it.
Here’s a little bit about me in case we’ve never met.  I’m an undergrad student majoring in Economics and Humanities, and I'm also minoring in Political Science and Business Administration.  Those fields of study probably betray my tendency to think deeply–perhaps too deeply–about everyday things we often take for granted.  When I was young, I was that child who asked “why?” about everything, and I haven't changed much.  I enjoy contemplating the hidden, abstract forces of reality, and I do it a lot.  I also happen to have a short attention span, bouncing from one idea to the next.  Sometimes when I think I’m onto something neat I’ll get distracted and forget what I was thinking about.
And that’s where the idea for a blog started.  Blogs are canvases, and I could use one to spit out some thoughts I’d like to develop.  The publicity of a blog would also motivate me to develop them well, and, if blogging helps, to keep spitting out thoughts.
A few words of explanation before we start.  First, I’m guessing that most of my posts will be more like streams of thought rather than well-crafted essays.  The rough draft will probably be very close to, if not the same as, the final draft.  As a result, any grammarians hopping through here will likely leave with a twitch in their eye, but I've decided I don't mind because this blog is intended to be my thoughts on "paper" rather than a collection of successful standalone essays.  
Second, my writing style.  It probably won’t take long for you to find that my writing is not a beach read.  I’m usually a linear, logical thinker, and my writing tends to follow a similar pattern.  I guess I’m telling you this because A) You’ve now been warned.  B) You should know I’m not being pretentious or trying to impress anybody.  C) Most importantly, I’m not assuming my readers are dumb; I’m assuming my readers are different from me.  If we have different backgrounds and different modes of thought, your connection of A and D won’t be as persuasive to me because I won’t necessarily assume B and C like you would.  Explaining B and C helps me appreciate your thought as a whole.  So, even if B and C make the writing dense, I find explaining them to be worth the time.  If a reader understands where I’m going with a point, I take no offense with him skimming or reading the first and last sentences of paragraphs or something.  (Not that you needed my permission, but at least you know I'm aware of the issue and condone a sensible response.)
Third, "knowlership" is kinda just an inside joke.  If you don't know it, it's not worth explaining here.  
Onto actual writing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Danger of Creativity

Why are we often frightened to demonstrate our work?  Perhaps I’m in the minority, but I have often hesitated to share fruits of my labor.  Whether artistic, athletic, or academic, I tended to keep my projects hidden, if I had a say in the matter.  While I’m unsure how many others resonate with my reluctance, I do know that I am not alone in this mindset.  Is this mindset good?  Does it more significantly promote humility or insecurity?  Should we encourage such thoughts or deter them? I propose that our fear of expressing our creativity is rooted in the uniquely personal nature of the human imagination, for no human faculty offers so clear a window into one’s soul.  To help us more properly respond to the sentiment in question, I wish to investigate its origin. When we create, we engage at least three distinct faculties: understanding, imagination, and the body.  Consider a chef.  To cook well, the chef must know the traits and capabil...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Fight over DACA Makes Home Hostile for Young Immigrants

As part of the deal ending January’s government shutdown, Congress has until February 8th to strike a deal on immigration. Hanging in the balance are the fates of nearly 700,000 young people now at risk of deportation after the Trump administration announced the phasing out of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA) last fall. In his State of the Union Address on January 30, Donald Trump reiterated his plan to grant assistance if his long-promised border wall receives funding. Democrats insist on unconditional relief. Known as “Dreamers,” these immigrants are too important for Congress to relegate them to political pawns. Instead, they should regain legal status with a path to citizenship. The Obama administration created DACA in 2012 to buy time for some undocumented immigrants while Congress developed comprehensive immigration reform. Under certain conditions, DACA allowed people who illegally entered the country as children to receive official documentation...
Post a Comment
Read more

How to Create a Drug Crisis

Three months after declaring the opioid crisis a national emergency , President Trump declared during his first State of the Union that the United States would beat the epidemic by getting “much tougher on drug dealers and pushers.” Such combative rhetoric draws attention away from the real narrative behind America’s biggest drug epidemic: bad government policy catering to special interests. The Rise and Fall of OxyContin Prior to the 1990s, doctors generally viewed opioids as a last resort due to their addictive properties . Two medical perspectives shifted . First, a 1992 federal report concluded that fear of opioid addiction prevented too many patients from receiving the pain relief they needed. Around the same time, medical professionals began to accept chronic pain as a legitimate reason for treatment, with or without the presence of other symptoms. The resulting medical paradigm shift led to a spike in the demand for painkillers, and pharmaceutical companies raced to ...
Post a Comment
Read more