Skip to main content

Introduction



Thanks for taking the time to not only visit my humble site but to also read about my vision for it.
Here’s a little bit about me in case we’ve never met.  I’m an undergrad student majoring in Economics and Humanities, and I'm also minoring in Political Science and Business Administration.  Those fields of study probably betray my tendency to think deeply–perhaps too deeply–about everyday things we often take for granted.  When I was young, I was that child who asked “why?” about everything, and I haven't changed much.  I enjoy contemplating the hidden, abstract forces of reality, and I do it a lot.  I also happen to have a short attention span, bouncing from one idea to the next.  Sometimes when I think I’m onto something neat I’ll get distracted and forget what I was thinking about.
And that’s where the idea for a blog started.  Blogs are canvases, and I could use one to spit out some thoughts I’d like to develop.  The publicity of a blog would also motivate me to develop them well, and, if blogging helps, to keep spitting out thoughts.
A few words of explanation before we start.  First, I’m guessing that most of my posts will be more like streams of thought rather than well-crafted essays.  The rough draft will probably be very close to, if not the same as, the final draft.  As a result, any grammarians hopping through here will likely leave with a twitch in their eye, but I've decided I don't mind because this blog is intended to be my thoughts on "paper" rather than a collection of successful standalone essays.  
Second, my writing style.  It probably won’t take long for you to find that my writing is not a beach read.  I’m usually a linear, logical thinker, and my writing tends to follow a similar pattern.  I guess I’m telling you this because A) You’ve now been warned.  B) You should know I’m not being pretentious or trying to impress anybody.  C) Most importantly, I’m not assuming my readers are dumb; I’m assuming my readers are different from me.  If we have different backgrounds and different modes of thought, your connection of A and D won’t be as persuasive to me because I won’t necessarily assume B and C like you would.  Explaining B and C helps me appreciate your thought as a whole.  So, even if B and C make the writing dense, I find explaining them to be worth the time.  If a reader understands where I’m going with a point, I take no offense with him skimming or reading the first and last sentences of paragraphs or something.  (Not that you needed my permission, but at least you know I'm aware of the issue and condone a sensible response.)
Third, "knowlership" is kinda just an inside joke.  If you don't know it, it's not worth explaining here.  
Onto actual writing.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to Create a Drug Crisis

Three months after declaring the opioid crisis a national emergency , President Trump declared during his first State of the Union that the United States would beat the epidemic by getting “much tougher on drug dealers and pushers.” Such combative rhetoric draws attention away from the real narrative behind America’s biggest drug epidemic: bad government policy catering to special interests. The Rise and Fall of OxyContin Prior to the 1990s, doctors generally viewed opioids as a last resort due to their addictive properties . Two medical perspectives shifted . First, a 1992 federal report concluded that fear of opioid addiction prevented too many patients from receiving the pain relief they needed. Around the same time, medical professionals began to accept chronic pain as a legitimate reason for treatment, with or without the presence of other symptoms. The resulting medical paradigm shift led to a spike in the demand for painkillers, and pharmaceutical companies raced to
Post a Comment
Read more

Syrian Missile Strikes are About Brand, Not Strategy

The United States, along with France and the United Kingdom, launched missile strikes against Syria on April 7. In a prepared statement, President Trump declared these strikes were a “deterrent” in response to a poison gas attack in Douma, a city a few miles northeast of Damascus, that killed hundreds of civilians. President Trump also stated these attacks were vital to U.S. security. But without a long-term plan, the strikes raise more questions about the United States’ foreign policy strategy than answers. Earlier in April, Trump ordered the removal of troops from Syria, but there is no indication of how the U.S. expects to administer this policy after the strike. Given how little foreign intervention has impacted Syria’s civil war, it is unlikely that these strikes will alter the course of the conflict that has claimed and displaced hundreds of thousands of lives since 2011. It’s much more likely that these high-profile strikes are more effective in shaping the Trump admin
Post a Comment
Read more

With New Tax Deduction Law, High-Tax States Even Costlier

A recent study published by the Cato Institute suggests the new GOP tax reform will add pressure to state governments with high taxes. Among the numerous reforms in the recent Republican-backed tax law is a $10,000 cap on state and local tax (SALT) deductions. Before the tax reforms, there was no limit to the amount of state and local taxes people could deduct from their federal taxes. The study suggests that since the SALT deduction cap went into effect, states with higher tax rates have experienced higher out-migration rates. Understanding why this out-migration exists and what it means for state and local tax policy first requires an understanding of some public finance theory. Unlike goods and services produced by private business, though, determining the “price” for government services is not straightforward. A restaurant can look at a balance sheet and find when a price is too high for its burgers or when it can charge more for fries. A state cannot so easily isolate when
Post a Comment
Read more